Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_R565EA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_R565EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515EA
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221110
Uptime20.3 Days
Run DateJun 02 '23 at 09:58
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 219
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 261
35% 261 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 15CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
9.67% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 13.4
9% 11.8 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 13.5
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.67%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1033
Write 712
Mixed 710
181% 818 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 45.8
158% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 672
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 569
412% 540 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 189%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
478GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 100 103 101 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 100
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 102
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Crucial CB4GS2666.C8GT 8GB
3200, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 15.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 13.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_R565EA Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_R565EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback