Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '23 at 08:06
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 204
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 507
54% 428 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Lighting 88.9
Reflection 132
Parallax 177
72% 133 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 92.2
Splatting 160
123% 151 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 404 413 443 440 443 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 368
Write 442
Mixed 387
SusWrite 411
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 46.6
151% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 138
162% 281 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
135GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 94 95 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 96
Write 95.4
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 94.8
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
447GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 129 129 130 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 144
Write 128
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 129
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C1GMM.AUW0C 04CD F4-2400C17-8GNT 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.4% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 20
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 19.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,944 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback