Positivo D6200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo D6200  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-RIB360EE
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200325
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 02 '23 at 00:27
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 614
66% 527 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
ASRock(1849 3E92) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 6.5
5% 6.33 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CL1-8D512 512GB
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E990903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 780 912 194 230 200 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1600
Write 1,018
Mixed 927
SusWrite 421
220% 991 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 23.6
124% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 683
DQ Mixed 97.2
183% 350 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 147%
Great: 172%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
811GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 164 167 171 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 115
Mixed 110
SusWrite 168
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD416F82-2666E 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 10.2
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D6200 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo D6200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback