Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	6.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

11 months ago, 11 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9500T 2,730 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	Memory 32.1 1-Core 22.7 2-Core 22.2 18% 25.7 Pts	4-Core 69.1 8-Core 67.4 9% 68.2 Pts	64-Core 96.5 6% 96.5 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 092F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.04% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 8.1 Parallax 7.3 6% 7.37 fps	MRender 8.8 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 10.5 7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.04% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KingFast 256GB 7,147 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0718B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 56 78 37 80 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 345 Write 234 Mixed 272 SusWrite 72.3 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 9.2 4K Mixed 7.6 26% 8.17 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 56.6 DQ Mixed 51.3 47% 73.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 139%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown J641GU42J9266NL 2x8GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 13.9 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 6.9 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 243 16% 243 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	416x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 65,338 samples	206x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	26x

SSD
NVMe SK hynix 256GBBc501Bench 110%, 8,328 samples	45x
NVMe KIOXIA 256GBKbg40zns256gBench 149%, 13,282 samples	34x
NVMe Samsung 256GBPm991Bench 98%, 4,948 samples	30x

RAM
HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 1x16GBUnknownBench 48%, 606 samples	48x
HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBUnknownBench 44%, 2,734 samples	41x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 1x8GBUnknownBench 44%, 3,962 samples	31x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16