Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '23 at 21:02
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 27.7
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 150
45% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 235
25% 201 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 2.5
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.9
4% 5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPT310M8SSD256G 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB2.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 303
Write 148
Mixed 144
43% 198 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 15.2
57% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 40.6
DQ Write 40.9
DQ Mixed 34.5
28% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.4% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 269
15% 269 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback