Asus Strix GL703GS_GL703GS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics68.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemAsus Strix GL703GS_GL703GS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL703GS
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210816
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJun 01 '23 at 18:03
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 124
56% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 320
33% 264 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1011) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.9% Good
Lighting 88.2
Reflection 115
Parallax 89.1
72% 97.4 fps
MRender 79.5
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 83.4
63% 76.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 799
Write 1,033
Mixed 572
179% 802 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 30.1
98% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 419
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 383
282% 373 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
325GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 120 120 118 121 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 104
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 116
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 26.5
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 17.5
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Strix GL703GS_GL703GS Builds (Compare 382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

System: Asus Strix GL703GS_GL703GS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback