MSI MAG B550M MORTAR MAX WIFI (MS-7C94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C94
MotherboardMSI MAG B550M MORTAR MAX WIFI (MS-7C94)  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '23 at 11:13
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
60% Good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 141
57% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 514
46% 386 Pts
64-Core 1,103
68% 1,103 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 60%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Device(7377 1580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 164
Parallax 172
146% 172 fps
MRender 217
Gravity 136
Splatting 118
124% 157 fps
Poor: 121%
This bench: 131%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 230 219 220 223 218 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 427
Mixed 354
SusWrite 241
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 43.3
146% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 310 306 310 311 310 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 428
Mixed 355
SusWrite 319
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 46.4
154% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 361
275% 370 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Zhitai SC001 Active 1TB SSD
387GB free
Firmware: ZT015200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 402 393 429 426 419 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 422
Write 399
Mixed 342
SusWrite 407
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 33.7
114% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 302
216% 276 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89%
Great: 102%
Fanxiang S790 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: H221123a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1451 1986 1930 1964 1958 1747 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,064
Write 1,859
Mixed 1,843
SusWrite 1,839
428% 1,901 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 54.5
180% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 624
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 603
436% 566 MB/s
Poor: 267%
This bench: 275%
Great: 589%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
248GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 161 163 160 155 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 157
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 157
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TAC4U3200E18082C 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 35.2
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 29.7
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550M MORTAR MAX WIFI (MS-7C94) Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M MORTAR MAX WIFI (MS-7C94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $491
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback