Dell OptiPlex 3080

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3080
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3080  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230308
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJun 01 '23 at 07:06
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 119
2-Core 229
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 737
71% 583 Pts
64-Core 921
57% 921 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.6% Average
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 48.4
45% 53.4 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 46.2
38% 46.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMT1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 446 456 453 414 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 435
Mixed 364
SusWrite 375
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 36.4
144% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 178
163% 246 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 97%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KF3200C16D4/8GX 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 3080 Builds (Compare 2,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3080

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback