Asus ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '23 at 05:15
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 190
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 621
58% 480 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 142
Parallax 150
116% 145 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 143
Splatting 120
104% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA72H6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,608
Write 1331
Mixed 572
258% 1,170 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 27.2
126% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 661
DQ Write 455
DQ Mixed 588
431% 568 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 306%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
21GB free
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 456
Write 398
Mixed 410
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 44.1
145% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 360
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
7GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 464
Mixed 346
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 44.6
153% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 28
98% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 25.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA Builds (Compare 983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $931
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback