Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 15:01
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 182
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 375
49% 370 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.30
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.56% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 12.2
8% 11.4 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 11.2
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 155 94 94 93 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.1% Good
Read 252
Write 237
Mixed 202
SusWrite 124
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 39.6
131% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 192
144% 191 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
26GB free
Firmware: 1H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 102 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 67.5
Write 70.5
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 102
52% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
164% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2PV Builds (Compare 2,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV - $78

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback