Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory54.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 03:09
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 190
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 721
64% 543 Pts
64-Core 1,644
102% 1,644 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49% Average
Lighting 61.7
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 82.6
50% 68.1 fps
MRender 60.6
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 44.6
46% 58.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 2TB SSD
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0600
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 375
Write 423
Mixed 405
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 39
132% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 282
231% 330 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 123%
PNY CS900 2TB SSD
296GB free
Firmware: 0702
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 369
Write 424
Mixed 397
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 38.8
129% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 284
232% 331 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 123%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
3TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 164
Write 139
Mixed 122
176% 142 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 1.1
416% 5.57 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 0.9
444% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 58.2
MC Write 51.9
MC Mixed 47.4
150% 52.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 18.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 129%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback