Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	Dell Precision Tower 7810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 7810 (all builds)
Memory	51.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201019
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 19 '23 at 03:18
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 1,639 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 88.9 2-Core 181 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 731 63% 538 Pts	64-Core 1,612 100% 1,612 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.1% Average	Lighting 61.7 Reflection 61.2 Parallax 91.5 50% 71.5 fps	MRender 60.8 Gravity 70.5 Splatting 45.3 47% 58.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 2TB SSD 1,413 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 314GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0600 SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 210 268 271 292 438 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 395 Write 304 Mixed 406 SusWrite 288 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 39.2 132% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 284 232% 331 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 123%
PNY CS900 2TB SSD 1,413 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 296GB free Firmware: 0702 SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 440 436 439 439 407 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Read 382 Write 433 Mixed 406 SusWrite 433 94% 414 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 70.1 4K Mixed 39.3 133% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 284 231% 329 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 64GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	MC Read 57.8 MC Write 51.9 MC Mixed 47.5 150% 52.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 17.6 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	143x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	115x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	89x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	138x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	121x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	82x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $70Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	39x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	31x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	27x

RAM
HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 95%, 876 samples	82x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	62x
M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 97%, 963 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 29% - Poor

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16