HP EliteOne 800 G3 23.8-in Touch GPU AiO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteOne 800 G3 23.8-in Touch GPU AiO  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 829C
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 02:31
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 217
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 530
56% 448 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
HP(103C 829C) 2GB
CLim: 1053 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 23.8
13% 21.3 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 18
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$65
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 146 159 288 63 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 824
Write 554
Mixed 563
SusWrite 167
117% 527 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 44.5
158% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 327
268% 373 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.3% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 22.7
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteOne 800 G3 23.8-in Touch GPU AiO Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteOne 800 G3 23.8-in Touch GPU AiO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback