bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
Motherboard X99-D3
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 20:44
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 150
59% 100 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 605
54% 454 Pts
64-Core 1,153
71% 1,153 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 19.6
12% 19.7 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 22.6
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e3000 512G 512GB
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10514
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1569 1053 431 244 234 231 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,751
Write 1,685
Mixed 1,507
SusWrite 627
312% 1,392 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 45.9
146% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 524
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 381
284% 385 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 171%
Great: 300%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
159GB free
Firmware: A50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 113 117 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 109
Write 95.5
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 116
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5270DH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 26
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 16.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback