bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago.

Motherboard	X99-D3
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 29 '23 at 21:13
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 592 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	53.8% Above average	Memory 67.5 1-Core 74.4 2-Core 128 54% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 260 32% 244 Pts	64-Core 445 28% 445 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Lighting 14.7 Reflection 24.9 Parallax 19.8 12% 19.8 fps	MRender 23.7 Gravity 14.9 Splatting 22.5 17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e3000 512G 512GB 1,084 User benchmarks, average bench 221% 259GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN10514 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1397 984 399 262 232 233 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	148% Outstanding	Read 1499 Write 1,505 Mixed 1,493 SusWrite 584 285% 1,270 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 39.5 126% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 271 204% 277 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 300%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 159GB free Firmware: A50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 114 119 124 116 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 110 Write 97.2 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 117 70% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5270DH0-CK0 4x4GB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	46.8% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 19.4 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 10 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,033x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,576x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	938x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,049x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	518x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	377x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16