Asus P8H61-M LX3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive10.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 14:18
Run Duration434 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 75.5
42% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 72
8-Core 86.7
10% 79.3 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.26% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 3.6
5% 4.37 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.26%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 3.4 19 30 38 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.9% Very poor
Read 94.5
Write 59.4
Mixed 64
SusWrite 21.6
13% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 4.3
16% 6.33 MB/s
DQ Read 16.9
DQ Write 24
DQ Mixed 18.1
14% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 53%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
532GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 124 114 122 116 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 104
Write 137
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 116
70% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EWB4GB681PAE-16IC 12GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 5.8
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX3 Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback