Smbiostype1_systemmanufacturer SmbiosType1_SystemProductName

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSmbiostype1_systemmanufacturer SmbiosType1_SystemProductName  (all builds)
MotherboardSmbiosType2_BoardManufacturer SmbiosType2_BoardProductName
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 08:50
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Memory 18.8
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 112
31% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 173
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 5.2
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 6
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sk600 256gb 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0909A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 241 289 255 261 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 322
Write 221
Mixed 252
SusWrite 253
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 9.9
39% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 45.7
61% 110 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 171%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 126GB
99GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 17 19 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 50.2
Write 19.2
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 17.8
32% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2.1
102% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 329
12% 329 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SmbiosType1_SystemProductName Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Smbiostype1_systemmanufacturer SmbiosType1_SystemProductName

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback