Gigabyte GA-B660M GAMING DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 306%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 336%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics253% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B660M GAMING DDR4  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 01:34
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 214
2-Core 428
128% 245 Pts
4-Core 858
8-Core 1,531
144% 1,195 Pts
64-Core 2519
156% 2519 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 126%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$774
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Lighting 370
Reflection 356
Parallax 381
301% 369 fps
MRender 510
Gravity 310
Splatting 222
270% 348 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 253%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 480G 480GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12172
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 277 270 40 69 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 422
Mixed 403
SusWrite 190
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 49.9
187% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 267
196% 255 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 39.7
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 30.4
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 116%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B660M GAMING DDR4 Builds (Compare 1,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660M GAMING DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback