Gigabyte GA-B660M GAMING DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics248% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B660M GAMING DDR4  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 00:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 213
2-Core 422
127% 242 Pts
4-Core 769
8-Core 1,423
131% 1,096 Pts
64-Core 2,492
154% 2,492 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 118%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$765
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
248% Outstanding
Lighting 362
Reflection 348
Parallax 376
295% 362 fps
MRender 487
Gravity 306
Splatting 220
262% 338 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 248%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 480G 480GB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12172
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 464
Mixed 359
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 48.8
182% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 255
192% 254 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 39.2
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 29
90% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B660M GAMING DDR4 Builds (Compare 1,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660M GAMING DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback