Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 29 '23 at 23:12
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	URY-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Memory 92.1 1-Core 140 2-Core 274 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 905 87% 715 Pts	64-Core 1,353 84% 1,353 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$990 22,998 User benchmarks, average bench 290% Asus(1043 88CB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 532.03 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (99 fps cap detected)	81.1% Excellent	Lighting 99.3 Reflection 99.4 Parallax 99.4 81% 99.4 fps	MRender 99.4 Gravity 99.4 Splatting 99.5 81% 99.4 fps
Poor: 263% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 305%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,253 Write 324 Mixed 159 124% 578 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 5.2 45% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 428 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 360 265% 352 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 243%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 44GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 143 144 140 142 135 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35% Below average	Read 150 Write 56.6 Mixed 117 SusWrite 142 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 9.7 34% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 184 148% 210 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 148 153 153 154 156 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 84.2 Write 45.7 Mixed 59 SusWrite 150 62% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 101%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 13,609 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 220GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 84 98 84 82 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 210 Write 36 Mixed 108 SusWrite 87.1 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 17.4 2,283% 9.43 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 213%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 64GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 88 90 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 61.6 Write 46.7 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 88.2 48% 64 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 4x8GB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	MC Read 48.6 MC Write 52.9 MC Mixed 42.1 137% 47.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 22.3 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	765x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	196x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	115x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16