Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 29 '23 at 22:08
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	URY-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Memory 89.3 1-Core 132 2-Core 255 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 513 8-Core 910 86% 712 Pts	64-Core 1,348 83% 1,348 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$990 22,998 User benchmarks, average bench 290% Asus(1043 88CB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 532.03 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (99 fps cap detected)	80.8% Excellent	Lighting 98.9 Reflection 98.8 Parallax 99.1 81% 98.9 fps	MRender 99.3 Gravity 99.3 Splatting 99 81% 99.2 fps
Poor: 263% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 305%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,737 Write 855 Mixed 632 235% 1,075 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 80.7 4K Mixed 43.9 156% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 462 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 365 275% 372 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 243%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 9,880 User benchmarks, average bench 307% 221GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 69 83 71 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 613 Write 180 Mixed 82.9 SusWrite 76.6 52% 238 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 23.9 90% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 41.3 DQ Mixed 74.6 70% 113 MB/s
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 541%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 44GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 145 146 143 145 144 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 373 Write 216 Mixed 246 SusWrite 147 55% 246 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 36 126% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 198 157% 220 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 154 158 155 155 158 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 146 Write 99.3 Mixed 82.1 SusWrite 155 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 64GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 90 92 90 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 90.4 Write 82.6 Mixed 67 SusWrite 89.6 61% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 4x8GB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	MC Read 48.7 MC Write 52.2 MC Mixed 42 136% 47.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 23.2 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	765x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	196x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	115x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16