Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Desktop Pro PCI MT (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 834F
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221213
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 29 '23 at 14:58
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Memory 89.3 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 217 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 583 61% 487 Pts	64-Core 595 37% 595 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B9) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.68 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.3% Average	Lighting 53.1 Reflection 55.2 Parallax 47.8 43% 52 fps	MRender 42.2 Gravity 49.6 Splatting 45 37% 45.6 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$75 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 437 457 469 438 348 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 444 Mixed 430 SusWrite 411 101% 448 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 52.5 171% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 325 242% 322 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 130%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$75 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 374GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 442 457 469 470 356 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 478 Mixed 432 SusWrite 419 103% 459 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 79.7 4K Mixed 53.6 174% 58.4 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 325 245% 329 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 130%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 741GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 125 127 126 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.9% Very good	Read 144 Write 149 Mixed 56.9 SusWrite 126 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.6 240% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G 2x8GB 8,345 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.3% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 22.5 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 33.2 SC Mixed 24.2 71% 25 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	34x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	8x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x

SSD
MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GBCrucialBench 77%, 2,468 samples	8x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 98%, 1,495 samples	7x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	18x
M378A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 2,458 samples	3x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GBSamsungBench 77%, 248 samples	2x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $167

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16