HP 24-b124d

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 24-b124d  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B7
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '23 at 08:28
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 102
49% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 280
29% 233 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 930MX
HP(103C 81B7) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3203
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 9.3
8% 9.73 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 6.7
7% 8.93 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RX7 MSATA 256GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2111A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 159 75 54 55 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 435
Write 402
Mixed 360
SusWrite 115
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 6.9
80% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 11.3
71% 159 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
12GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 92 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 100
Write 99.5
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 91.3
66% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4R4GS24A16R Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GB
2400, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.8% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 24-b124d Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP 24-b124d

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback