Acer Extensa 215-52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics4.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemAcer Extensa 215-52  (all builds)
MotherboardIL Taurus_IL
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateMay 29 '23 at 05:58
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
UC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 137
51% 109 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 119
22% 151 Pts
64-Core 99
6% 99 Pts
Poor: 19% Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Acer(1025 1422) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.57% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.6
4% 4.9 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 8.6
5% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.57%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Teutons Osmium M 128GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 39 106 40 87 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 426
Write 230
Mixed 318
SusWrite 71.2
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 0.8
19% 6.5 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 63.7
DQ Mixed 90.5
66% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 151%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
899GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 60 94 97 96 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 115
Write 108
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 88.2
66% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 0.7
SC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.6 GB/s
Latency 977
4% 977 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 215-52 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 215-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback