Acer Extensa 215-52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Extensa 215-52  (all builds)
MotherboardIL Taurus_IL
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 29 '23 at 05:54
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
UC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 12.4
2-Core 40.8
11% 26.6 Pts
4-Core 68.5
8-Core 80.8
10% 74.7 Pts
64-Core 77.4
5% 77.4 Pts
Poor: 19% Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Acer(1025 1422) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.1
5% 4.8 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 0.3
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Teutons Osmium M 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 101 52 39 102 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 550
Write 134
Mixed 318
SusWrite 87.5
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 8.1
42% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 127
96% 128 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 151%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 68 100 109 106 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 117
Write 97.9
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 97.6
67% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.01% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.8
7% 2.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 0.2
SC Mixed 0.2
1% 0.23 GB/s
Latency 603
7% 603 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 215-52 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 215-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback