Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

19 months ago, 12 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191014
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	May 28 '23 at 23:23
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 75.1 1-Core 144 2-Core 280 89% 166 Pts	4-Core 550 8-Core 903 89% 726 Pts	64-Core 1,375 85% 1,375 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8) CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 2063 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Lighting 93.6 Reflection 92.8 Parallax 87.2 76% 91.2 fps	MRender 68.1 Gravity 82.8 Splatting 75.3 62% 75.4 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 30 18 27 41 28 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 442 Write 366 Mixed 304 SusWrite 51 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 15.4 71% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 91.4 DQ Mixed 31.8 42% 77.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 55%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,582 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 170GB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 117 117 126 127 128 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 79.8 Write 59.6 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 121 94% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 52%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB 1,821 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 340GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 81 85 86 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 90.5 Write 83.1 Mixed 50.6 SusWrite 83 102% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FP 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68% Good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 27 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 25.9 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,471x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,313x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,011x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	958x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	745x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	658x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	719x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	343x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	286x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	295x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	230x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16