Lenovo 20A7002FUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20A7002FUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20A7002FUS
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '23 at 03:07
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 34.9
2-Core 67.1
36% 54.9 Pts
4-Core 75.4
8-Core 77.5
10% 76.4 Pts
64-Core 80.8
5% 80.8 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2218) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.94% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3.6
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.94%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 175 249 230 240 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 366
Write 339
Mixed 304
SusWrite 228
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 23.9
78% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 188
152% 216 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR6A-PB N0 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.6% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.2
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20A7002FUS Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20A7002FUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback