Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266 8,235 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 88.3 2-Core 169 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 390 42% 334 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP 38,816 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.3 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Lighting 60.2 Reflection 58.5 Parallax 89.5 49% 69.4 fps	MRender 59.1 Gravity 66.1 Splatting 43.9 45% 56.4 fps
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$62 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 99 51 62 52 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 374 Write 331 Mixed 284 SusWrite 94.3 60% 271 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 9.5 53% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 35.7 47% 84.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 55%
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25 4,646 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 43GB free Firmware: WT100-33 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 56 55 54 54 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 45 Write 50.8 Mixed 37 SusWrite 54.5 34% 46.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 8GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 18 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 16.2 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	446x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	415x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	392x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	577x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	219x
HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 2,722 samples	144x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384