Lenovo 10ST007EUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10ST007EUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 312A
Memory53.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 13:08
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 86.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 260
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 788
76% 626 Pts
64-Core 904
56% 904 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000
Nvidia(10DE 151D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.9% Good
Lighting 85.8
Reflection 95.4
Parallax 93.7
70% 91.6 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 77.1
70% 87 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$220
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1599 1663 1722 1806 1567 1074 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,131
Write 2,005
Mixed 1434
SusWrite 1,572
401% 1,786 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 52.2
164% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 669
DQ Write 489
DQ Mixed 611
448% 590 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 258%
Great: 371%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
413GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 441 450 462 441 356 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 470
Mixed 449
SusWrite 430
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 44
140% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFRA32A.M16FE 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.M16FE 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.2% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 25
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10ST007EUK Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10ST007EUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback