Performance Results

Gaming 264%
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 300%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics287% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 04:57
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$240
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 76.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 310
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,189
107% 899 Pts
64-Core 2,071
128% 2,071 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,750
Asus(1043 889C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
287% Outstanding
Lighting 423
Reflection 458
Parallax 603
345% 495 fps
MRender 445
Gravity 486
Splatting 260
311% 397 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 287%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 414 198 144 265 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,617
Write 1,617
Mixed 1,165
SusWrite 237
259% 1,159 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 70.5
238% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 833
DQ Write 783
DQ Mixed 599
507% 738 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 189%
Great: 295%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
439GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 141 137 142 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 106
Write 117
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 141
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 177 179 173 176 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 102
Write 142
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 177
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 27.1
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 29.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 129%
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 130%

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $184

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback