Huawei NBLK-WAX9X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHuawei NBLK-WAX9X  (all builds)
MotherboardHUAWEI NBLK-WAX9X-PCB
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230106
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 04:54
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 132
48% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 373
39% 315 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Device(19E5 3E19) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.30.22
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.39% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 4.4
2% 3.37 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.39%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGXA4103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,322
Write 979
Mixed 1,009
245% 1,103 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 42.4
137% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 716
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 623
462% 615 MB/s
Poor: 129% Great: 265%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 12.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NBLK-WAX9X Builds (Compare 571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Huawei NBLK-WAX9X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback