Lenovo 20FXS0CQ00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20FXS0CQ00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FXS0CQ00
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20161028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 23:48
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6440HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 188
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 327
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Legend(17AA 5050) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3203
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 11.5
10% 11.3 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 9.6
8% 10 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 897 966 934 963 1117 1113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 911
Write 916
Mixed 787
SusWrite 998
204% 903 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 55.5
183% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 560
460% 659 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 186%
Great: 383%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965657-035.A00G 9965657-035.A00G 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.3% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 22.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 14" 1280 720 LEN40A9
Typical 20FXS0CQ00 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FXS0CQ00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback