Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory1024GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 1024GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H12DSi-N6
Memory996.9 GB free of 1024 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1872 x 1004 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 22:24
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core
CPU1, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 59.9
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 190
63% 115 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 772
68% 577 Pts
64-Core 4,282
265% 4,282 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZQL23T8HCLS-00A07 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GDC5302Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,264
Write 2,544
Mixed 2,114
516% 2,307 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 40.6
134% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 724
DQ Write 552
DQ Mixed 646
481% 641 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 485%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40AB2-CWE 16x31.9GB
16 of 16 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
235% Outstanding
MC Read 103
MC Write 78.9
MC Mixed 114
282% 98.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 29.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 235%
Great: 283%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback