Lenovo 20ESCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20ESCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ESCTO1WW
Memory36.1 GB free of 56 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171213
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 18:58
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 59.7
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 164
58% 104 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 453
42% 350 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 222D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 3.4
2% 6.23 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 0.2
2% 3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000L7 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT25L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 56 56 58 57 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 385
Write 339
Mixed 260
SusWrite 78.7
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 26.5
95% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 313
238% 322 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
691GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 127 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 21.7
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 126
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 99%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905663-008.A00G 9905663-008.A00G Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 9905663-008.A00G 56GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.8% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 21.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 20.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20ESCTO1WW Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20ESCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 180% - Outstanding Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback