Lenovo 10A7000QUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10A7000QUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 17:33
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 182
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 452
49% 389 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
CLim: 2122 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 118
Parallax 126
112% 127 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 104
Splatting 85.9
87% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 121 43 98 128 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.4% Poor
Read 259
Write 159
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 73.4
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
40% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 102%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
492GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 82 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 68.6
Write 88.9
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 80.9
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.8% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 16.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10A7000QUS Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10A7000QUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback