Lenovo 11SFS0BR00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemLenovo 11SFS0BR00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3740
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230302
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 25 '23 at 04:40
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 85.1
1-Core 170
2-Core 298
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 960
94% 769 Pts
64-Core 1,157
72% 1,157 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6400
Legend(17AA 2183) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.18.03
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.1% Below average
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 67.2
29% 55.3 fps
MRender 81.6
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 27.3
38% 49.9 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4256HBJD-00BL7 256GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL2QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1063 1096 918 441 197 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,232
Write 876
Mixed 916
SusWrite 643
205% 917 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 74.9
280% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 993
DQ Write 1,196
DQ Mixed 822
695% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 223%
Great: 272%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 177 179 179 181 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 164
Mixed 92.6
SusWrite 180
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 111%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston LV32D4U2S8SD-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 18.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback