Casper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCasper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER LGFA 001
Memory18.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220509
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateMay 24 '23 at 21:52
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 69.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 252
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 563
58% 470 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Quanta(152D 1317) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4369
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 20.7
14% 25.4 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 14.1
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR031 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 41 101 147 144 244 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 685
Write 860
Mixed 498
SusWrite 172
124% 554 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 28.1
94% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 482
308% 356 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 253%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
94GB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 14 19 21 107 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 322
Write 203
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 30.2
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 18.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 15.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback