Biostar H61MLV2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H61MLV2  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130227
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateMay 24 '23 at 18:21
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G860-$73
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 90.8
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 76.3
58% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 81.7
8-Core 93.3
11% 87.5 Pts
64-Core 94.3
6% 94.3 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia(10DE 098F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 2.4
4% 4.1 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 4.2
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11055
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 209 189 219 226 225 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
921GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 183 176 190 194 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 119
Write 112
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 185
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MLV2 Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MLV2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback