HP Compaq Pro 4300 SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Pro 4300 SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2ADE
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120529
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateMay 24 '23 at 11:33
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 185
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 424
47% 370 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Gigabyte(1458 3547) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 1.2
3% 2.5 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 2.3
2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 27 24 3.9 54 20 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.7% Below average
Read 242
Write 214
Mixed 201
SusWrite 49.2
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 17.4
64% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 31.2
41% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
193GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 125 126 125 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 108
Write 104
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 125
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 1TB
836GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 53.2
Write 24.8
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 25.5
39% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.8
42% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 9905471-006.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 4300 SFF PC Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 4300 SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback