Lenovo 20H5A031CL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20H5A031CL  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20H5A031CL
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220615
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateMay 24 '23 at 02:15
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 96
2-Core 158
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 212
32% 230 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 505C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.35% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 6.9
5% 8.57 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 6
Splatting 0.2
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.35%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 567 540 511 521 537 539 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 702
Write 820
Mixed 708
SusWrite 536
156% 692 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 37.2
123% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 461
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 237
204% 308 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 114%
Great: 277%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
631GB free
Firmware: 08.01A08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 91 91 90 88 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 92.1
Write 90.6
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 89.2
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FN 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 17.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20H5A031CL Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20H5A031CL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback