Lenovo 30B5CTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemLenovo 30B5CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 102F
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '23 at 20:34
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 214
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 565
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Lighting 105
Reflection 85.8
Parallax 102
86% 97.7 fps
MRender 85.5
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 66
60% 75.1 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$66
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 141 167 195 179 195 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 467
Mixed 444
SusWrite 171
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 50.2
165% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 130%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$57
233GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 13 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 112%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
439GB free
Firmware: CC82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 12 15 13 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CVF 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 30.2
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 19.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30B5CTO1WW Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Lenovo 30B5CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback