Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2336 21 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 72.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 200 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 582 60% 485 Pts	64-Core 753 47% 753 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28% Poor	Lighting 35.4 Reflection 38.9 Parallax 36.9 29% 37.1 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 37 Splatting 25.8 26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HUS722T2TALA600 2TB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 34 41 44 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 207 Write 44.5 Mixed 58.4 SusWrite 40.6 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 285% 2 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMAA2GU7CJR8N-XN 000000000C01 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	99.2% Outstanding	MC Read 40.3 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 34.5 109% 38.3 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 23.3 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 96.4 42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E-2314IntelBench 60%, 26 samples	2x
Xeon E-2336IntelBench 69%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TBBench 430%, 44,185 samples	1x
Green M.2 2280 240GBWDBench 59%, 276 samples	1x

RAM
HMAA2GU7CJR8N-XN 000000000C01 32GBUnknownBench 102%, 2 samples	1x
HMAA2GU7CJR8N-XN 1x16GBUnknownBench 48%, 18 samples	1x
9ASF2G72AZ-3G2B1 002C00000C01 18ASF2G72AZ-3G2A1 32GBUnknownBench 109%, 1 sample	1x