Lenovo 30B5CTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 30B5CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 102F
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMay 23 '23 at 18:59
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 209
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 555
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$230
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.3% Very good
Lighting 100
Reflection 80.4
Parallax 86.3
82% 89 fps
MRender 80.9
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 62.3
57% 70.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 119 180 212 207 216 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 411
Write 370
Mixed 300
SusWrite 174
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 33.6
118% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 252
213% 310 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 130%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
233GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.9 11 9.3 9 8.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 112%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
439GB free
Firmware: CC82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.2 12 13 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CVF 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 26
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 28.6
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30B5CTO1WW Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Lenovo 30B5CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback