Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211013
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 23 '23 at 05:52
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,145
102% 861 Pts
64-Core 2,943
182% 2,943 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Gigabyte(1458 401E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 118
Parallax 132
104% 126 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 119
Splatting 110
109% 137 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KLEVV CRAS C710 256GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 289 259 305 389 404 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,635
Write 169
Mixed 58
SusWrite 312
116% 544 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 8.9
94% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 542
493% 744 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 148%
Great: 185%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
171GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 310 81 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 403
Write 398
Mixed 317
SusWrite 157
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 34.4
120% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 121%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
734GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 420 424 444 445 443 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 443
Mixed 297
SusWrite 414
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 34.3
118% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 197
148% 199 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 121%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 196 199 200 210 198 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 328
Write 205
Mixed 262
SusWrite 215
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 38.2
132% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 157
123% 168 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
774GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1641 1640 1637 1649 1631 1617 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
488GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 88 89 95 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 108
Write 63.4
Mixed 53
SusWrite 88.5
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.2% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 27.5
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 24.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,311
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback