Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Positivo Schoolmate 18SF20PA2 (all builds)
Motherboard	ECS SF20PA2
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180817
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '23 at 03:43
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Memory 20.9 1-Core 26.1 2-Core 44.4 18% 30.5 Pts	4-Core 45.1 8-Core 44.9 6% 45 Pts	64-Core 46.2 3% 46.2 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.87% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.9 1% 0.83 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.87% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Unknown DF4128 125GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 23 22 25 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.4% Poor	Read 59.6 Write 29.7 Mixed 33.7 SusWrite 27.1 28% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 3.2 580% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde Team-Ind-1600 1x4GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.5 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.67 GB/s	Latency 314 13% 314 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	1x

RAM
Team-Ind-1600 1x4GBUndeBench 17%, 96 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16