Dell Latitude 5440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude 5440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 08HD28
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '23 at 14:24
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1350P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 63.4
1-Core 194
2-Core 379
108% 212 Pts
4-Core 724
8-Core 1,044
111% 884 Pts
64-Core 1590
98% 1590 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0C00) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 25.9
18% 24.7 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 18.4
19% 23.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cl4-3d256-q11 NVMe SSSTC 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 25301111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,579
Write 1,499
Mixed 1,151
314% 1,410 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 29.5
171% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 727
542% 731 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 261%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
15GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20.2
Write 18.4
Mixed 20.4
25% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
84% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG66MEBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 58.4
MC Write 46.9
MC Mixed 48.5
146% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 29.7
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 133%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude 5440 Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Dell Latitude 5440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback