HP 500-132a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-132a  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1350 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130905
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '23 at 11:33
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 168
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 435
47% 374 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.49
Relative performance (0th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 33.6
Parallax 32.3
27% 33 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 364
Write 342
Mixed 326
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 9.53 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
327GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 167 172 172 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 119
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 170
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 1R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 16% 58 206 56 144 17.7" 1280 720 ACR0853 KG272 S
Typical 500-132a Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP 500-132a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $151
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback