Asus ASUS EXPERTBOOK B1500CEAEY_B1500CEAE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS EXPERTBOOK B1500CEAEY_B1500CEAE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK B1500CEAEY
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221222
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateMay 21 '23 at 06:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 57.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 259
80% 152 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 510
59% 457 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 179C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4369
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 21.9
16% 19.7 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 15.8
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1122 1353 1274 613 216 387 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,604
Write 1,527
Mixed 1,363
SusWrite 828
299% 1,330 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 73.5
259% 95.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,122
DQ Write 633
DQ Mixed 818
625% 858 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 234%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF Micron 16GB
2133, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 11
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS EXPERTBOOK B1500CEAEY_B1500CEAE Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS EXPERTBOOK B1500CEAEY_B1500CEAE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback