Gigabyte GA-MA770-DS3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA770-DS3  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080624
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '17 at 22:38
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9750B Quad-Core
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 35.6
2-Core 71.3
43% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 143
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 318GB
296GB free
Firmware: 1.10
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 101
Write 128
Mixed 118
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.66
4K Mixed 0.62
147% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 108%
AMD 1X2 Mirror/RAID1 500GB
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 122
Mixed 135
118% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.42
100% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
25.5% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA770-DS3 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-DS3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback