TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME Z490-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z490-V  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateMay 20 '23 at 18:34
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$249
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 148
2-Core 298
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,120
102% 856 Pts
64-Core 1,894
117% 1,894 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑
This bench: 96.7%
 Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Zotac(19DA 8617) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 201
Parallax 191
175% 202 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 151
Splatting 133
126% 158 fps
Poor: 135% ↑
This bench: 147%
 Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1903 1110 1113 1113 1107 904 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1452
Write 2,433
Mixed 1,690
SusWrite 1,208
384% 1,696 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 71.4
246% 91.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1189
DQ Write 901
DQ Mixed 1,064
790% 1,051 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑
This bench: 255%
 Great: 303%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
931GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 271 291 289 284 281 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 459
Write 367
Mixed 304
SusWrite 303
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 15.1
61% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 29.6
44% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 60.3%
 Great: 58%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
1TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 154 155 157 153 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 126
Write 125
Mixed 75
SusWrite 156
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 80.7%
 Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL32G32C16U4B.M16FB1 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.2
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 45.9%
 Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME Z490-V Builds (Compare 1,781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 176%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z490-V - $200

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel  $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples528x
Core i9-10900KIntel  $430Bench 100%, 107,269 samples364x
Core i9-10850KIntel  $249Bench 99%, 84,873 samples263x
GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia  $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples456x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples364x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples126x
SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD  $149Bench 228%, 180,890 samples502x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples55x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD  $95Bench 204%, 97,624 samples53x
RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples168x
BL8G30C15U4R.M8FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 83%, 4,507 samples87x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GBTeamBench 87%, 9,447 samples68x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback